Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19.03.2010 09:47, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
...
(That would also help with the other kind of cross references, "see [19]
section 4.2" when [19] is updated. The likelihood that 4.2 is renumbered
shrinks, since xml2rfc can warn when it happens.)
...

The preferred RFC editor style is symbolic names, btw.

rfc2629.xslt already supports an extension where the section number becomes part of the markup, making all kinds of interesting extensions possible.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]