I can see this both ways. The value of a "meetings" list is that it has an obvious topic. The value of a "specific meeting" list is that it has an obvious topic and the membership of it is well defined - those who register for (and presumably attend) a given meeting and opt in. The down side of a "meetings" list is for those who attend once and wander off; they will eventually be interested in a way to unsubscribe. All things considered, I think I slightly prefer a per-meeting list. On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: >> I agree that we should move this to a new list: ietf-78 which I hereby ask Ray to create. > > > Is there some reason we need a new list for every meeting? > > Why not have a single, stable, continuing mailing list for these postings. > > ietf-meeting, for example. > > d/ > > -- > > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
