Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Julian Reschke wrote:

>> What exactly is the purpose of "a few non-ASCII characters everybody can
>> display"?  And while the environments that I use are mostly capable
>> to display ISO-Latin-1, I do _NOT_ know names for the majority of symbols
>> from>  128, and would have severe difficulties discussing stuff with
>> such symbols in speech, like in-person, at a bar, over lunch or on the
>> phone, and therefore don't want to have any of them in RFCs.

> A few characters should be sufficient with specs that deal with I18N.

Yes, but, ASCII back slash is already a little too much enough for
us Japanese, because, in Japan, JIS Latin, which assigne Yen sign
to the code point of back slash, is so widely used.

Yes, we can and do accept it but no Latin-1 please. Most people
in Japan can recognize Yen sign as back slash but can't recognize
Latin-1 specific characters with fancy diacritica marks at all.

							Masataka Ohta


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]