That would meet most of my issues, provided of course that the XML2RFC format was published. Zero time spent going to an editable format is better than any amount of 'easy conversion'. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Tony Hansen <tony@xxxxxxx> wrote: > +1 > > On 3/17/2010 12:18 PM, John R. Levine wrote: >> >> If we could agree that the final XML was authoritative, and if >> necessary let them hire someone to fix xmlrfc so it can produce the >> text version without hand editing or postprocessing, that would be a >> big step forward. > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- -- New Website: http://hallambaker.com/ View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week, http://quantumofstupid.com/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf