On 22 jun 2010, at 16.15, Paul Hoffman wrote: > It should be seriously considered (and they should get a new draft out...) instead of a hodgepodge of scheme-specific methods. Consider a new draft posted tomorrow (it is already close to evening here in Sweden, and my cats are screaming after food). Patrik
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf