On May 7, 2010, at 10:12 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > And, yes, a regular IETF participant who attended the last > meeting on a day pass should have been able to know whether that > would count for the Nomcom qualification or not. But nothing > prevented a person in that position from asking the question > before he or she registered, in which case we would, > appropriately, have had this discussion prior to Anaheim. Well, being such a person, before I registered for a day pass I did not consider the NOMCOM ramifications. If I had, I think it would likely that I would simply have assumed the existing BCP were in force. I argue that what the IETF now proposes is not a clarification to the BCP but a change to the BCP. Applying such changes retroactively stinks. So, I guess I won't have NOMCOM eligible this year (due to the change, assuming I attend the next IETF under a full registration). -- Kurt _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf