Re: The anonymity question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Indeed.

In one group their was a little troll who filed a patent on the entire
standard. They then extorted stock which probably fetched a seven
figure sum when a company using the specification launched their IPO.

Given the sorry fact that the bar to granting a patent in the US is
very low, the bigger problem in my view is that it is difficult to get
any 'clever' idea into a spec since even if the proposer is acting in
good faith there is resistance to anything that might be too good an
idea.


On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Fred Baker <fred@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 2010, at 6:07 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
>
>> The ability of users to sign up from throwaway accounts doesn't seem to have been a big problem in practice, but it does make it hard to claim that the lists are free of submarine patent trolls.
>
> A person's identity and their behavior are two different things. I would presume that every IETF working group or BOF list has at least one person on it who is lurking in the discussion for the purpose of filing a frivolous lawsuit later. Not sure how we can prevent that.
>
> http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>



-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]