Re: The anonymity question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> 
> On 7/25/10 6:21 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> > 
> > A person's identity and their behavior are two different things. I
> > would presume that every IETF working group or BOF list has at least
> > one person on it who is lurking in the discussion for the purpose of
> > filing a frivolous lawsuit later. Not sure how we can prevent that.
> 
> lurking does not in our definition amount to a contribution.

"Lurking", i.e. to watch (monitor) what is going on in IETF working groups
is designed to be anonymous.  RFC, I-Ds and mailing list archives do
not require any authentication or subscription.  If they did, things
would no longer be public, but instead membership-only (even if
membership does not require a fee and is open to the public).

Btw. if a person, by his/her own free will decides to publish something
through IETF channels (e.g. on an IETF mailing list, during a WG session
at an IETF meeting or by submitting an I-D), then this is a whole
different kind of PII information than payment data collected
by the IETF (secretariat or whoever handles the payments when registering
for an IETF meeting).


-Martin

PS: you do not need to create an publish a privacy policy before you
    can purchase and read Bill Clintons autobiography, neither as
    a private person, nor as a (representative of) coporate entity.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]