On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:46:12AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > I was discussing this with various people yesterday - maybe it would be > useful to have a "moving average" NOMCOM, with a two year term, and 50% > replacement each year. Once that was set up, I think that the need for > experienced hands would diminish - one year on the NOMCOM seems to be > quite a bit of experience. A 50% replacement rule would be, in my view, very much preferable to the two-tier version that's been proposed. The original proposal will, in my view, make the Nomcom effectively the domain of the "experienced" people -- i.e. the "elect" will just take over, and Nomcom decisions will be whatever those three want (regardless of the best intentions of all the participants). This new proposal will still create a differentiation in the Nomcom, but that differentiation is not based on being the product (either direct or indirect) of previous Nomcoms. This is a change I would support. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf