That is understood, Andrew's comment I seconded was about the possibility of the change becoming permanent after Beijing. -- Ciao, Enrico Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2010, at 21:19, "Ole Jacobsen" <ole@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Enrico, > > Nobody has suggested there was anything wrong with the old (NUL) > access method nor that any damage has ever been caused, but that > is entirely orthogonal to the matter at hand. We are (in November) > going to a location where such access is "required" (at least it > seems a good idea from host's point of view), so we are testing > it in another location, Maastricht, first to iron out bugs etc. > > Ole > > > On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, Marocco Enrico wrote: >> +1 >> >> Also, if we really need to switch to a new access method, I would >> deeply appreciate if someone explained what was wrong with the old >> one, i.e. what damage was ever caused by an open IETF network. If >> any. >> >> -- >> Ciao, >> Enrico >> >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf