Hi Roni, Comments inline below and some snipping of the thread. Thanks, Mary. On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mary, > When I read the charter it is not clear why from the first paragraph you > deduct the second paragraph. > If the first paragraph will say > " The goal of this working group is to enable inter-domain communications > over the Internet, using protocols such as SIP, while still allowing people > to use the called person assigned circuit switch phone number for > identifying the person with whom they wish to communicate. " > It may look clearer. [MB] We could change "phone number" to "called person assigned circuit switch phone number for identifying the person", but I think that "phone number" is well understood to be exactly what you want to describe it as. [/MB] > > Still this is based on the assumption that using other ways to assign and > authenticate SIP phone numbers using central databases is not catching up > because the carriers object to implement it and not due to any other reason > like preferences of enterprises IT to use PSTN for calls because of better > quality of service and manageability. [MB] I'm not certain (personally) that the latter preferences you note are as prevalent as you might suggest. I would still contend that the larger issue is the former. However, if other folks share this concern, we can certainly add that as well - it reflects equally as being a non-technical reason for widespread implementation [/MB] > > Roni Even > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dispatch-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:dispatch-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Mary Barnes >> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 6:24 PM >> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) >> Cc: DISPATCH; IETF-Discussion list >> Subject: Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 >> >> Hi Dan, >> >> The term peer to peer is intended to exclude mechanisms that would use >> a central repository for the information: This was discussed in an >> earlier thread: >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg02027.html >> >> In one sense it is a solution, however, in another sense it is reusing >> SIP related functionality defined in RAI and thus is in a similar vein >> as specifying the use of SIP in a charter. >> >> Thanks, >> Mary. >> >> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) >> <dromasca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The VIPR WG will address this problem by developing a peer to >> >> peer based approach to finding domains that claim to be >> >> responsible for a given phone number and validation protocols >> >> to ensure a reasonable likelihood that a given domain >> >> actually is responsible for the phone number. >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Clarification question. What exactly means 'peer to peer based >> approach' >> > and what kind of approaches are excluded by having this in the >> charter. >> > Does 'approach' mean solution? If so why does a specific type of >> > solution need to be agreed in the charter, while all we have at hand >> at >> > this point are individual contribution I-Ds that describe the >> 'problem >> > statement and some possible starting points for solutions'? >> > >> > Thanks and Regards, >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: dispatch-bounces@xxxxxxxx >> >> [mailto:dispatch-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes >> >> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 8:38 PM >> >> To: DISPATCH >> >> Subject: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3 >> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> dispatch mailing list >> dispatch@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch > > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf