Re: IETF privacy policy - still a bad idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>You appear to be concerned about exposing the IETF to risk by the  
>adoption of a privacy policy (but apologies if I am misunderstanding  
>the concern you expressed).  The absence of a privacy policy, however,  
>actually increases risk to the IETF in at least three ways:

 ... none of which applies since 

a) the IETF has no formal legal existence
b) the IETF has no employees
c) the IETF signs no contracts

It would be helpful for someone, anyone, to explain in terms specific
to the IETF what a privacy policy will accomplish.  Please be sure to
make no references whatsoever to any other organization, since none of
them are (un)organized like the IETF is.  While you're at it, be sure
not to use the word "obvious" or its synonyms.

I could be persuaded that there is a reason to have a privacy policy,
but everything I've seen so far has been a combination of faulty
analogies and mistaken premises.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]