Re: Question - Can DNSSEC be operated in a manner which meets Khaled mandates?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Todd, I just read the ruling on this and am confused as to why you
would think this applies to DNSSEC rather than DNS (or other
information systems).  The reason this case was unable to proceed and
the evidence was rejected seems to be because of the police handling
of the system and witness.  The ruling specifically states that
video/evidence capture devices are still admissible (See section II
"analysis") as long as timeline and/or "reasonable representation of
what it is alleged to portray." is available.

The problem is that the officer made available to the court had no
firsthand knowledge of the incident, no understanding of the system,
no knowledge of the time of information handling, and no internal
knowledge of the development / testing of the system.

Either this applies everywhere and DNSSEC is not unique or it applies
nowhere as the data path will be further confirmed by
administrator/operator knowledge.

Can you explain in more detail with specific references as to how this
applies to DNSSEC or IS systems as a whole.  I fail to see your
concern.  Also, operations is separate from prosecution.  DNSSEC has
other purposes than prosecution and can most certainly be operated
within this ruling.  I don't personally see issues with prosecution as
long as the witnesses understand and explain how the situation was
handled.

BTW, the appeals case number I read is: 30-2009-00304893.  Please let
me know if there is another case you are referencing.

Peter

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:56 PM, todd glassey <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Folks - there is a Court Ruling from the 4th Appellate District which
> is turning off Red Light Camera's everywhere and there is a question as
> to whether that ruling would also effect how Secure DNS Services are run
> and if so what would it do.
>
> The ruling is called California v Khaled and is getting significant
> traction here in the State of California in all courts.
>
> Todd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]