<wearing no hats>
On Jul 5, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 7/5/2010 9:05 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
In discussing the policy with the IAOC and others, it seems clear
that the RFC
model is probably not the best model for maintaining and updating a
document
like this.
While I could imagine that you are correct, the answer isn't at all
clear to me.
Presumably it should represent community consensus and should not
change all that often. And having an archival copy makes sense. So
I'm not understanding why it should not be published as an RFC.
I assume (for I do not know) that people are worried about time
involved in bringing a new RFC to publication.
I don't see why this couldn't be divided in the way that the Trust
Legal Provisions have been :
- a RFC to set the _goals_ and basic framework of the privacy policy,
which might change something like every 5 years (or less often if we
are lucky) and
- an IAOC document for the actual privacy policy itself, which could
be changed very quickly if (say) lawyers started beating down the doors.
Regards
Marshall
Please clarify.
Thanks.
d/
ps. I, too, like the idea of having the policy. I'm only asking
about its form.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf