this makes sense to me, fwiw. john --On Monday, July 05, 2010 2:28 PM -0400 Marshall Eubanks <tme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <wearing no hats> >... > I assume (for I do not know) that people are worried about > time involved in bringing a new RFC to publication. > > I don't see why this couldn't be divided in the way that the > Trust Legal Provisions have been : > > - a RFC to set the _goals_ and basic framework of the privacy > policy, which might change something like every 5 years (or > less often if we are lucky) and > > - an IAOC document for the actual privacy policy itself, which > could be changed very quickly if (say) lawyers started beating > down the doors. > > Regards > Marshall > > > > >> Please clarify. >> >> Thanks. >> >> d/ >> >> ps. I, too, like the idea of having the policy. I'm only >> asking about its form. >> >> -- >> >> Dave Crocker >> Brandenburg InternetWorking >> bbiw.net >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf