At 10:21 AM -0700 7/9/10, The IESG wrote: >The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG >(tls) to consider the following document: > >- 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions ' > <draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard > >The purpose of this Second IETF Last Call is to confirm some changes >made as a result of the first IETF Last Call and subsequent >discussions. The main issue was handling of the Server name >indications: dealing with multiple names and dealing with session >resumption. Also a discussion in the security considerations on >why SHA-1 is acceptable for extensions that use it. I support the new wording for both. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf