On 7 jul 2010, at 16:32, John Morris wrote: > And, if you indeed think that something is missing, perhaps you could suggest some language to address your concern, rather than just dismiss the entire effort. I think it's completely legitimate to question whether efforts like this are worth the resources they soak up. The first time I went to an IETF meeting I was shocked by the amount of talk about the internals of the IETF itself that went on. We should really try to minimize this navel gazing and only indulge in it when clearly needed, something that hasn't been shown to be the case here. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf