A few more privacy policies for comparison:
ISO -- http://www.iso.org/iso/support/privacy_policy.htm
IEEE -- http://www.ieee.org/security_privacy.html?WT.mc_id=hpf_priv
Note that IEEE uses a "layered" notice to some extent, which is fairly
popular among privacy policy authors these days -- a layered policy
shows the essential information on one page or at the top of the page
and includes links to other pages or sections with further
information. That could certainly be an option for the IETF.
IEEE also includes a section on law enforcement requests for data.
In my strawman, I was aiming to be as comprehensive as possible on the
theory that it would be easier to take things out than to dig them up
and add them later. I used a few models (most obviously CDT's policy
-- http://cdt.org/content/privacy-policy) and cribbed some language
directly from the ISOC policy.
Alissa
On Jul 9, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
On Jul 8, 2010, at 11:06 PM, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
RIPE is an open group of people interested in IP based networks in
Europe
and surrounding areas. There is no formal membership, work is
done by
volunteers, anybody who is interested can join the mailing lists and
participate, anybody who pays the meeting fee can attend the
meeting and
participate there. From an organizational point of view, it is
pretty
similar to the IETF.
This is getting fairly far afield of the topic, but let me explain
where I'm coming from.
I did a google search for privacy statements, and came to http://labs.ripe.net/node/49
. Poking around, I found http://www.ripe.net/membership/gm/gm-may2010/evoting-announcement.html
, which is about RIPE NCC membership, attendees, and voting. I also
found another statement that said it was from RIPE (as opposed to
the RIPE NCC) and listed members, voting, and attendees, but now I'm
not dredging that up.
To bring matters back to the topic, the discussion was on Alissa's
draft, and I was looking for comparable privacy statements to
compare. My question was "is this a reasonable statement? Are there
things it could have said more simply? Are there things it left out?
Are there things it should not have included?"
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf