Cullen the answer to your question is No. -----Original Message----- From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:06 AM To: Gonzalo Camarillo Cc: DISPATCH list; IESG IESG; IETF-Discussion list Subject: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss) I don't think this resolves the issue. The issue is if this information is used for a call control. Basically do proxies need to be able to look at this to make decision about what they are going to do. We at least need a Yes/No answer to this question from the proponents of this work and the charter to make that clear. On Jul 14, 2010, at 2:25 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for your comments on the charter proposal. Per the comments > received, we will modify bullet 5 as follows so that it is clearer: > > OLD: > 5. SIP elements may need to apply policy about passing and screening > the information. > > NEW: > 5. SIP elements may need to apply policy about passing and filtering > UUI. The included application, encoding, semantics, and content > information will allow endpoint or intermediary SIP elements to > allow or block UUI based on the type and originator, not based on > the actual UUI data, which may be end-to-end encrypted by the > application. > > Further discussions on this topic should happen on the mailing list of > this WG. > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf Cullen Jennings For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf