On 7/6/2010 2:45 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > On 2010-07-06 03:56, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: >> On 5 jul 2010, at 18:05, Alissa Cooper wrote: >> >>> 1) Respond on this list if you support the idea of the IETF having >>> a privacy policy (a simple "+1" will do). >> >> I'm torn between "good to have this written down" and "do we really >> need to go out and look for more process work". >> >>> 2) If you have comments and suggestions about the policy itself, >>> send them to this list. >> >> What I'm missing is what happens with the information described under >> "Registering to attend a meeting or social event:", there are no >> retention periods mentioned (that I noticed). > > the trust's records retention policy already deals with registration. These records are constrained by a number of privacy statutes which cannot be signed away. That is why this must be done outside the IETF's normal process. What should happen is that a committee should produce this and then that be formally disclosed to the entire IETF membership - meaning every member of every list, the IESG, IRTF, and IAOC as well. That way positive disclosure can be accomplished. This also should be redone on a yearly basis to reinforce this mandate. Todd > _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf