Throwing a draft at the IETF without a lot of supporting work rarely gets anywhere, but some people find it hard to figure out just what "supporting" work is actually effective and to execute on it. It's the non-procedural parts of the IETF process that confound people, and lead to various end runs. I suspect that the way to lessen the number of "on the edge" activities is to (1) encourage interim meetings including BOFs with good teleconferencing, and (2) make the process for getting work considered in the IETF even more procedural than it is, to make it easier for sumner to work with it.
On Jul 30, 2010 3:07 PM, "Yoav Nir" <ynir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:True.
On Jul 30, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> Yoav Nir wrote:
>> First is people who have an...
There doesn't need to be, but that is one way to do things. There are hundreds of drafts posted every week. We all ignore most of them. A short presentation might get enough people interested to start a discussion on some mailing list.
> The implication that there needs to be a session, with a room
> and slides and humans sitting in ...
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.o...
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf