Re: IETF privacy policy - still a bad idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 7/24/2010 3:36 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
>> The IETF has a legal home, named ISOC. Let me rephrase: "Do you think
>> ISOC is not subject to the laws of Europe?"
>
> Of course they are.  But that's OK, since ISOC has had a privacy
> policy in place since 2006, which makes specific reference to the
> "safe harbor" policy kludge worked out between the US and EU:
>
> http://www.isoc.org/help/privacy/
>
>> Good grief.
>
> Indeed.  Do we agree that this means we're done?

No, we are NOT done with this, not unless that is the IETF is formally
acknowledging that its practices meet that existing privacy mandate and
in a manner which provides a demonstration of how that process is
implemented in the IETF.

Todd Glassey

>
> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]