IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Gen-ART Review of draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government"
  • From: John Levine
• Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: John Curran
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type (see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: Simon Perreault
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type (see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• RE: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Suzanne Woolf
• Re: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ray Hunter
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Lou Berger
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• RE: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: l.wood
• Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government"
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Christian de Larrinaga
• Re: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Loa Andersson
• "The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government"
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type (see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: Simon Perreault
• Re: leader statements
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues
  • From: Chris Griffiths
• Re: consensus, was leader statements
  • From: John Levine
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement)
  • From: manning bill
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: leader statements
  • From: manning bill
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Avri Doria
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Medel v6 Ramirez
• Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement)
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: leader statements (was: Montevideo statement)
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-02
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Nominations for the Internet Hall of Fame Awards
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: leader statements
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: SM
• leader statements (was: Montevideo statement)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Arturo Servin
• RE: [Sdn] FW: Last Call: <draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-04.txt> (Software-Defined Networking: A Perspective From Within A Service Provider) to Informational RFC
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ole Troan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ole Troan
• [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-sci-09.txt> (IODEF-extension for structured cybersecurity information) to Proposed
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-06
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-07
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Tobias Gondrom
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues
  • From: Chris Griffiths
• RE: [Sdn] FW: Last Call: <draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-04.txt> (Software-Defined Networking: A Perspective From Within A Service Provider) to Informational RFC
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Tobias Gondrom
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: SM
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05
  • From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
• Re: The RFC xx99 Series
  • From: Mark Atwood
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-02
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-06
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: [Sdn] FW: Last Call: <draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-04.txt> (Software-Defined Networking: A Perspective From Within A Service Provider) to Informational RFC
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Re: The RFC xx99 Series
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• NOMCOM 2013 - UPDATED 2nd Call for Nominations - APP, OAM, RAI, TSV
  • From: NomCom Chair
• Re: The RFC xx99 Series
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• RE: The RFC xx99 Series
  • From: Eric Gray
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ole Troan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 88 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: IETF 88 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: Ralf Skyper Kaiser
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: manning bill
• Re: year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: t.p.
• Re: year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Aaron Yi DING
• Re: [Diversity] year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Aaron Yi DING
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: manning bill
• RE: year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Martin Millnert
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Call for participation: Transport Services
  • From: Michael Welzl
• Re: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Yoav Nir
• RE: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: IPR disclosure for draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: Last Call: <draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-04.txt> (Revision of the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element) to Informational RFC
  • From: Scharf, Michael (Michael)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Aaron Yi DING
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• year for highest number of IETF participants
  • From: Aaron Yi DING
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Montevideo statement
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Jaap Akkerhuis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Lou Berger
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Scott Brim
• Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Jari Arkko
• IETF 88 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• Re: NIST documents
  • From: GTW
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: NIST documents
  • From: Daniel Karrenberg
• NOMCOM 2013 - Second Call for Nominations - two weeks left
  • From: NomCom Chair 2013
• Re: NIST documents
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: NIST documents
  • From: Thierry Moreau
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP to Historic, supporting DMARC instead
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP to Historic, supporting DMARC instead
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP to Historic, supporting DMARC instead
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: [mdnsext] WG Review: Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery (dnssd)
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: [Tools-discuss] independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP to Historic, supporting DMARC instead
  • From: Barry Leiba
• How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP to Historic, supporting DMARC instead
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: WG Review: Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery (dnssd)
  • From: Jaap Akkerhuis
• Re: WG Review: Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery (dnssd)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: WG Review: Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery (dnssd)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: WG Review: Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery (dnssd)
  • From: manning bill
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: WG Review: Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery (dnssd)
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: WG Review: Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery (dnssd)
  • From: manning bill
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13.txt> (Terms used in Ruting for Low power And Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Tools-discuss] independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12.txt>
  • From: Huub helvoort
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13.txt> (Terms used in Ruting for Low power And Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13.txt> (Terms used in Ruting for Low power And Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13.txt> (Terms used in Ruting for Low power And Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: NIST and NASA documents
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: NIST and NASA documents
  • From: Alexandru Petrescu
• RE: NIST documents
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: NIST documents
  • From: Ralph Droms
• NIST documents
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-03.txt> (Characterization of Proposed Standards) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12.txt>
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [Tools-discuss] independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: ietfdbh
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Diversity] Attracting people from emerging regions into the IETF
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Tools-discuss] independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: [Tools-discuss] independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Barry Leiba
• RE: [Tools-discuss] independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: l.wood
• RE: [Tools-discuss] independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: John E Drake
• Re: [Tools-discuss] independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Fwd: RAI AD - Gonzalo will not be re-running
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Attracting people from emerging regions into the IETF
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• independant submissions that update standards track, and datatracker
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
  • From: Black, David
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-01
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
  • From: Stephen Kent
• Re: [Insipid] WG Review: INtermediary-safe SIP session ID (insipid)
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [Insipid] WG Review: INtermediary-safe SIP session ID (insipid)
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• RE: LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• RE: LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: LC comments on draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01.txt
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Video of TCMTF BoF (was: Remote participation to igovupdate BoF)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Remote participation to igovupdate BoF
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Remote participation to igovupdate BoF
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Remote participation to igovupdate BoF
  • From: Alexandru Petrescu
• RE: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues
  • From: Chris Griffiths
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Transport Directorate review of: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14
  • From: Yakov Rekhter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-05.txt> (Recommendations on filtering of IPv4 packets containing IPv4 options.) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• RE: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-04
  • From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
• ISOC fellowship - Attracting new people and work into the IETF (was: In person vs remote participation to meetings)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: George, Wes
• RE: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: George, Wes
• RE: Transport Directorate review of: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Transport Directorate review of: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14
  • From: Yakov Rekhter
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Tony Tauber
• Re: DRAFT-IETF-GEOPRIV-RADIUS-LO-23
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Last Call: <draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-03.txt> (Characterization of Proposed Standards) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Time to dump X.400 support?
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Time to dump X.400 support?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Remote participation to igovupdate BoF
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues
  • From: SM
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-04
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Remote participation to igovupdate BoF
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Remote participation to igovupdate BoF
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: feedback & blog entry
  • From: SM
• Re: feedback & blog entry
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Time to dump X.400 support?
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: feedback & blog entry
  • From: IETF Chair
• RE: Transport Directorate review of: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Time to dump X.400 support?
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: George, Wes
• Time to dump X.400 support?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Transport Directorate review of: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14
  • From: Yakov Rekhter
• Transport Directorate review of: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-14
  • From: Black, David
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
  • From: Black, David
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-08
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Randy Bush
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [urn] Open letter to WG participants (was: Re: Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-06.txt)
  • From: SM
• NOMCOM 2013 - Call for Nominations
  • From: Hago Dafalla
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-21.txt> (RPKI-Based Origin Validation Operation) to Best Current Practice
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• NOMCOM 2013 - Call for Nominations
  • From: NomCom Chair
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Josh Howlett
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: joel jaeggli
• RE: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: feedback & blog entry
  • From: SM
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Christian Huitema
• RE: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-05.txt> (Recommendations on filtering of IPv4 packets containing IPv4 options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• IPR disclosure for draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id (was: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt)
  • From: SM
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: SM
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• RE: Education and Information Sharing ... was Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Moriarty, Kathleen
• Education and Information Sharing ... was Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: feedback & blog entry
  • From: todd
• Re: Dotless in draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: SM
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: todd
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Kevin Darcy
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: John C Klensin
• Dotless in draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Moriarty, Kathleen
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Martin Sustrik
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Vancouver meeting is coming up fast (reminder)
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• feedback & blog entry
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Josh Howlett
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-12
  • From: Jouni Korhonen
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Applied Networking Research Prize 2013 presentation at IETF-88
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-12
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06.txt> (Threat Model for BGP Path Security) to Informational RFC
  • From: Russ White
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06.txt> (Threat Model for BGP Path Security) to Informational RFC
  • From: Danny McPherson
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Transparency in Specifications and PRISM-class attacks
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Alan Clark
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-03.txt> (Characterization of Proposed Standards) to Best Current Practice
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Macro Expansion
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Macro Expansion (was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: IETF 88 - Hotel Reservations: REMINDER
  • From: Brian Haberman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Juliao Braga
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Why we don't want to actually replace 2026
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D Action: draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-02.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: Fwd: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Pat Thaler
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: [IETF] Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid-10
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Fwd: FW: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-04
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Alan Clark
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Dave Cridland
• RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Jim Gettys
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Why we don't want to actually replace 2026 (was: PS Characterization Clarified)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Greg Daley
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-05
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Yoav Nir
• RE: [Int-area] Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-01.txt> (Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Server Load Balancing) to Informational RFC
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: John Levine
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
  • From: John Levine
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: David Morris
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Juliao Braga
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Macro Expansion (was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• IETF Mentor Program
  • From: IETF Chair
• RE: [Int-area] Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-01.txt> (Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Server Load Balancing) to Informational RFC
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Glen Wiley
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: geoff . ietf
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Barry Leiba
• ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
  • From: Andy Mabbett
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: GTW
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Ralph Droms
• RE: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt> (Requirements for an End-to-End Session Identification in IP-Based Multimedia Communication Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• Re: Messages to SPFBIS mailing list (was: [spfbis] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19: (with COMMENT))
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Messages to SPFBIS mailing list (was: [spfbis] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19: (with COMMENT))
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tobias Gondrom
• Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
  • From: Tobias Gondrom
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.txt> (Requirements for an End-to-End Session Identification in IP-Based Multimedia Communication Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• RE: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Scott O Bradner
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Nicholas Weaver
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: robert bownes
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Dickson, Brian
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Dickson, Brian
• Re: PS Characterization Clarified
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• RtgDir Review: draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-05.txt
  • From: Thomas Heide Clausen
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06.txt> (Threat Model for BGP Path Security) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: David Morris
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Piling on [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
  • From: James Polk
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06.txt> (Threat Model for BGP Path Security) to Informational RFC
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [DNSOP] Practical issues deploying DNSSEC into the home.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker