Just to clarify, I am no saying that today we are leaderless. In fact I think we have a very good leadership. What I am saying is that if we that we want our leaders to only moderate discussion we are in a big problem. Regards, as On 10/10/13 4:52 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Then we have a big problem as organization, we are then leaderless. > > I'm not sure this is true. The IETF worked quite well (and produced a lot of > good stuff) back in, e.g. the Phill Gross era, when I am pretty sure Phill's > model of his job was indeed as a 'facilitator', not a 'leader' in the sense > you seem to be thinking of. So why do we now need a 'leader'? > > Noel >