Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The DT I am discussing has no clear problem to solve, the appointment is not clear, I have been asking for a WG but only DT was done. The DT has no milestones and no clear objectives, is it a DT or a WG. We don't need the DT to adopt or agree on any real draft effort submitted, it is the community that adopt or disagrees the output of any DT.

AB

On Saturday, October 12, 2013, Melinda Shore wrote:

On Oct 12, 2013 6:51 AM, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't understand your assertion that there is no procedure in the IETF to
> support the existence of a Design Team.

I'd be sorry to see this discussion dragged down a procedural rathole.

Melinda


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]