On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To be clear here, I did not think Pete's document was going for BCP. Indeed, but you are speaking of it as if it were, which was my point.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To be clear here, I did not think Pete's document was going for BCP. Indeed, but you are speaking of it as if it were, which was my point.