Re: Review of: draft-resnick-on-consensus-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/10/2013, at 11:03 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>   Now, a conclusion of having only rough consensus relies heavily on
>>   the good judgement of the consensus caller.  The group must truly
>>   consider and weigh an issue before the objection can be dismissed as
>>   being "in the rough".  The chair of the working group in one of these
> 
> In spite of being appealing to use here, I think that the phrase "in the rough" is actually distracting, and possibly inappropriate:
> 
>     http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/in+the+rough
> 
>     google:
> 
>        1. in a natural state; without decoration or other treatment.
>           "a diamond in the rough"
> 
>        2. in difficulties. "even before the recession hit, the project
>           was in the rough"

I think he's using it in the sense that it's used on a golf course...

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/








[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]