Re: Montevideo statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Medel,
At 19:11 09-10-2013, Medel v6 Ramirez wrote:
Leaders were "processed" thoroughly prior to their appointment so I trust them. And that they hold through the "spirit" of being an IETF and shall be responsible under oath for any impact on the organization.

There was a Recall petition last year (see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg75672.html ). Note that the IETF "Trustee have a fiduciary duty to protect the IETF's property".

What are the implications of:

  "They identified the need for ongoing effort to address Internet Governance
   challenges, and agreed to catalyze community-wide efforts towards the
   evolution of global multistakeholder Internet cooperation."

Should a global body have oversight over the IETF? Some people are arguing for that as part of the future of Internet Cooperation.

Regards,
-sm




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]