IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-06
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [perpass] [removed] metrics
  • From: SM
• Re: Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: l.wood
• Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: TSG - personal
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: John Levine
• RE: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Avri Doria
• Re: IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24
  • From: Michael Sweet
• Re: [IETF] Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Warren Kumari
• RE: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Andrew Feren
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Cyrus Daboo
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Jari Arkko
• deprecation of HTTP header field line folding, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• RE: [xrblock] Last Call: <draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12.txt> (RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for MOS Metric Reporting) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review, etc.
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Dan Harkins
• APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: John Levine
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Ted Lemon
• NOMCOM - Community Feedback and Office Hours
  • From: NomCom Chair 2013
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Bradner, Scott
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Bradner, Scott
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Bradner, Scott
• RFC2119 keywords in registration requirements
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Christian de Larrinaga
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: manning bill
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: manning bill
• Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Barry Leiba
• #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Information request for Secure WiFi standards
  • From: Howard Tinker
• Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Amos Jeffries
• Discussions on Internet Hardening in Vancouver
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Juliao Braga
• custom byte ranges, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: future of identifiers
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• future of identifiers
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Registration requirements for transfer codings, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: John C Klensin
• content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Registration requirements for transfer codings, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-05.txt> (Multicast Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (MPL)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ralph Droms (rdroms)
• IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: IGOVUPDATE session
  • From: Avri Doria
• Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: John C Klensin
• obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-labreqs-04
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IANA URIS, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• On anonymity.... (was: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx)
  • From: Olaf Kolkman
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12.txt> (A Thesaurus for the Terminology used in Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) drafts/RFCs and ITU-T's Transport Network Recommendations.) to Informational RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• IANA URIS, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12.txt> (A Thesaurus for the Terminology used in Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) drafts/RFCs and ITU-T's Transport Network Recommendations.) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-resnick-on-consensus-05
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pete Resnick
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12.txt> (A Thesaurus for the Terminology used in Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) drafts/RFCs and ITU-T's Transport Network Recommendations.) to Informational RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• IGOVUPDATE session
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [IETF] Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-08
  • From: Gonzalo Camarillo
• Re: [IETF] Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards
  • From: Moriarty, Kathleen
• Re: [IAB] Comments from the IAB on NIST SP 800-90A Proceeding
  • From: Russ Housley
• Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Comments from the IAB on NIST SP 800-90A Proceeding
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Comments from the IAB on NIST SP 800-90A Proceeding
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Comments from the IAB on NIST SP 800-90A Proceeding
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: Comments from the IAB on NIST SP 800-90A Proceeding
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-04
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Fwd: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: John Day
• RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored]
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored]
  • From: SM
• RE: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• International enforcement agencies join forces to thwart caller identification spoofing
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-06
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: l.wood
• Re: doubt about WG for e-mail protocol enhancement
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: doubt about WG for e-mail protocol enhancement
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• doubt about WG for e-mail protocol enhancement
  • From: Noel David Torres Taño
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored]
  • From: SM
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: John C Klensin
• IETF::ISOC (was Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RIPE and IGF presentations
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt> (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Applications open for ISOC Fellowship to IETF 89 (London)
  • From: Steve Conte
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: question: ISOC Panel at IETF88 in Vancouver?
  • From: Alexandru Petrescu
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: question: ISOC Panel at IETF88 in Vancouver?
  • From: CJ Aronson
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: John Day
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Christian de Larrinaga
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• question: ISOC Panel at IETF88 in Vancouver?
  • From: Alexandru Petrescu
• Re: [Sdn] FW: Last Call: <draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-04.txt> (Software-Defined Networking: A Perspective From Within A Service Provider) to Informational RFC
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Jukka Ruohonen
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: SM
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: John Day
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• RE: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: John Day
• RE: Anonymous postings
  • From: SM
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Anonymous postings
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Anonymous postings
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Anonymous postings
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: Anonymous postings
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Martin Vigoureux
• Internet Draft Submission Cut-Off Today
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Anonymous postings
  • From: SM
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Wesley Eddy
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG - draft-klensin-stds-review-panel-00
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Techno CAT
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [IETF] [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG - draft-klensin-stds-review-panel-00
  • From: SM
• Re: [IETF] Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: John Day
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: [IETF] Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: John Day
• Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [IETF] Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Jelte Jansen
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Internet standardisation remains unilateral
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG - draft-klensin-stds-review-panel-00
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG - draft-klensin-stds-review-panel-00
  • From: SM
• RE: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• RE: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• RE: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: SM
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Roger Jørgensen
• Re: Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Scott Brim
• Separate ADs roles from IESG
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Outstanding reviewers (was: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs)
  • From: SM
• IETF (ISOC) Compensation for Indentured Servitude Engineering
  • From: Techno CAT
• Re: [IETF] Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Outstanding reviewers
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Re: Outstanding reviewers (was: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs)
  • From: Joe Abley
• Outstanding reviewers (was: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs)
  • From: SM
• Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Sean Turner
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Opening session
  • From: Techno CAT
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• RE: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Size of IESG, Number of Areas (Was: CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Size of IESG, Number of Areas (Was: CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Size of IESG, Number of Areas (Was: CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Size of IESG, Number of Areas (Was: CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Size of IESG, Number of Areas (Was: CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Size of IESG, Number of Areas (Was: CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Size of IESG, Number of Areas (Was: CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Moriarty, Kathleen
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call forNominations)
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call forNominations)
  • From: t.p.
• Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• RE: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Moriarty, Kathleen
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-08
  • From: Hutton, Andrew
• RE: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Scott Brim
• [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology-09.txt
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-09.txt> (Out-of-Band Public Key Validation for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call forNominations)
  • From: t.p.
• On reviews was Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: mstjohns
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs
  • From: John Levine
• RE: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Moriarty, Kathleen
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• RE: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: l.wood
• RE: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Proper credit for work done -- on finding chairs (was CHANGE THE JOB)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• RE: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [BEHAVE] WG Action: Conclusion of Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave)
  • From: Tina TSOU
• Re: CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [BEHAVE] WG Action: Conclusion of Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave)
  • From: ietfdbh
• CHANGE THE JOB (was Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: Chaitanya Dhareshwar
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: John C Klensin
• Opening session
  • From: Chengetai Masango
• Re: NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: Tim Chown
• NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas
  • From: NomCom Chair 2013
• NOMCOM - Time-Critical - Final Call for Nominations
  • From: NomCom Chair 2013
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-03.txt> (Characterization of Proposed Standards) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12.txt> (A Thesaurus for the Terminology used in Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) drafts/RFCs and ITU-T's Transport Network Recommendations.) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• FW: Changes to complete draft-cotton-rfc4020bis
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Alejandro Acosta
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Alejandro Acosta
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08
  • From: Peter Yee
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking-08.txt> (IGMP/MLD-Based Explicit Membership Tracking Function for Multicast Routers) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ole Troan
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-03
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ray Hunter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ray Hunter
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• CSV, subsetting, and searching (was: Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>))
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IETF] Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: shogunx
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: SM
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: [IETF] Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Invitation to request an IETF mentor
  • From: IETF Chair
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type (see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: Tim Bray
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Terms and Conditions May Apply
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Terms and Conditions May Apply
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type (see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ray Hunter
• Re: Terms and Conditions May Apply
  • From: Gary E. Miller
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Terms and Conditions May Apply
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: WG Review: IPv6 Maintenance (6man)
  • From: SM
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: Adding a fragment identifier to the text/csv media type(see <draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment-06.txt>)
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• new draft needed
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Montevideo statement
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• IETF 88 Final Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: John Curran
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Pete Resnick
• RE: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Templin, Fred L
• Re: Last calling draft-resnick-on-consensus
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-05.txt> (Multicast Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (MPL)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government"
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government"
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: "The core Internet institutions abandon the US Government"
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• Re: Improving the ISOC Fellowship programme to attract people from under-represented regions into the IETF
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun