On 11/20/2013 9:44 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
I think explaining decisions which might not be obvious to a person who was not around when the decision was made is a good thing.
Why isn't the IETF mailing list archive discussion about the status change sufficient as an archival record?
To be consistent, are we also going to need to publish an RFC that explains why an RFC should be promoted to full standard? It's good to explain that decision too, isn't it?
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net