Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Historic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave,

The Historic status has always been the subject of some ambiguity and controversy, going back to the Founding Father. You have an opinion, some of us may have different opinions. The appropriateness of moving documents to Historic will probably never be fully settled. Meantime, we should note that there is something special about Historic, that is not true of any of the other status values: Historic is a demotion and it is final. So there is no consistency issue with asking for an explanatory RFC for Historic but not for full standard.

Here is a test: presumably somewhere somebody has a standard for acoustic couplers. This is obsolete technology, right? Do you expect that the owner of the standard will mark the standard "Obsolete"? I would not expect it.

Bob Braden


it is final.On 11/20/2013 9:50 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 11/20/2013 9:44 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
I think explaining decisions which might not be obvious to a person who
was not around when the decision was made is a good thing.


Why isn't the IETF mailing list archive discussion about the status change sufficient as an archival record?

To be consistent, are we also going to need to publish an RFC that explains why an RFC should be promoted to full standard? It's good to explain that decision too, isn't it?

d/






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]