On 11/20/2013 10:01 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
That pseudo-document has the necessary information, but it not
published as an RFC. I think that if the RFC metadata were modified
to point to the status-change document, so it's easy to find when one
is looking at the RFC, that should be all we need.
What a nifty suggestion.
Thanks!
d/
ps. FWIW, I apologize that I hadn't done the homework of searching the
RFC archive for examples of these move-to-historic explanatory RFCs.
There are surprisingly many of them. That doesn't change my underlying
concern about the burden, of course...
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net