> More than that, actually: the current process has added a > pseudo-document that we use to manage the status-change process: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-adsp-rfc5617-to-historic/ > > That pseudo-document has the necessary information, but it not > published as an RFC. I think that if the RFC metadata were modified > to point to the status-change document, so it's easy to find when one > is looking at the RFC, that should be all we need. (And, in fact, the datatracker header does point there. See: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5617/ ) Barry