On 11/13/13, 3:43 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
I would argue that we didn't have adequate representation from TC39 in
that discussion, and that their getting involved is as good a reason
as any to double-check that we've still got the same consensus. I know
that I for one decided to stop pushing for this when it looked like
there were a few more participants that wanted the status quo.
I personally am on the side of making this change. I think it'd be an
extreme shame if this incompatibility remained in the document.
Tony Hansen