--On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 07:13 -0800 Ned Freed
<ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> IMnvHO, any anti-spam approach that depends on good behavior
>> from the spammers is a waste of time unless it is accompanied
>> by strong, enforceable, and enforced "if you break these
>> rules, you will spend time in prison" provisions.
>
> While that is absolutely necessary, it's possible it's not
> sufficient, given, say, sufficient motivation on the part of
> spammers or jurisdictional issues on the enforcement side.
Indeed. I was addressing the necessary condition only. I would
have included the jurisdictional issues as part of "enforceable
and enforced", but that doesn't change either of our essential
points.
john