Re: [Json] BOMs (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-11-18 17:08, Pete Cordell wrote:
----- Original Message From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This feels backward, because BOMs are actually useful for UTF-16 and
UTF-32, but essentially useless for UTF-8.

Not useless if you're trying to tell the difference between a hand
editted Windows cp-1252 (or whatever it's called) encoded text file and
a UTF-8 encoded text file.

Ye.

I don't think we need them for any other reason, but I think some
international Windows users would be thankful if you allowed them for
that case.

So I gather "non-international Windows" users never need non-ASCII characters? :-) (Yes, that explains lots of I18N brokenness originating from certain countries...)

Best regards, Julian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]