On Nov 21, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are two assumptions that I'm not 100% convinced are entirely true > > 1- That a new supra entity will be ever able to deliver any solutions for level 8+ issues that please all when on the equal basis argument some will lobby to be more equal than others I'm not sure its "to deliver solutions" as much as facilitate existing groups to cooperatively work on solutions, but the point is taken and quite a realistic concern. > 2- That using ICANN as a reference, the multistakeholder model works reasonably well to be expanded I do not know whether the "ICANN" implementation of the multistakeholder will be used at all, as opposed to its practice in the RIRs, or as it is implemented in the IETF. > But I appreciate you taking the time to clarify some concepts and I agree that better and more coordination is needed but I believe we are trying to design the roof when we are not still sure if we have the right foundation. Happy to provide whatever information I can; I myself am unsure of 1net's probabilities for success, but am keeping an open perspective on it and figure its better than some of the possible alternatives that might emerge trying to do the same. /John