Re: Mandatory encryption as part of HTTP2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Nov 15, 2013 4:46 PM, "Ted Faber" <faber@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2013 20:41, l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > mandating encryption is unwise.
> >
> > Make encrytpion attractive. Make it easy to use and to deploy. Make the risks of not adopting encryption clear.
> >
> > But NEVER make it mandatory.
>
> Amen.
>
>
> --
> Ted Faber
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP:
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
> Unexpected attachment on this mail? See
> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
>
This is the wisest statement I've seen on this thread.  Encryption is wonderful but making it mandatory may cause unforeseen issues.

Respectfully,

Conrad Rockenhaus

http://www.rockenhaus.com/


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]