Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Thanks SM, very clear about ITU.

I really had a different perception about ISOC that's why I was asking, didn't know that Civil Society does not feel comfortable with ISOC.

I've finally got somebody at the ICANN meeting to provide a straight response about what 1net is, according to Adiel Akplogan it is a movement.not just an email list.

Regards
Jorge



On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:44 AM, SM <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jorge,

At 17:24 19-11-2013, Jorge Amodio wrote:
It is very confusing and I'm still trying to understand why this "dialog" can't take place under the umbrella of organizations like ISOC. Feels like and effort from ICANN + others to reinvent themselves.

The IAB announcement message mentioned "technical, academic, civil society, and business communities".  There are different groups and/or people in those communities who would like to have a say in dialogs about the net.  The umbrella could be the ITU or ISOC.  IETF participants might not take it very well if the umbrella is the ITU.  It's unlikely that groups/people within civil society would agree if the umbrella is called ISOC.  The alternative is to have some body invent some umbrella [1] for the dialog.  The umbrella up to now has been the IGF.  ICANN recommended a "coalition of the willing" for that dialog.

Regards,
-sm


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]