Re: WG Review: Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensions (eppext)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>One the drafts is about the marks in the ICANN Trademark 
>Clearinghouse.  I don't see how that draft fits within the Standards Track.

I believe that the draft is intended to describe an EPP extension a
registry uses to query the TMCH.  Since EPP is on the standards track,
that seems reasonable to me.

The draft needs a some work to make that clearer, though.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]