> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Levine > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 3:17 PM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Cc: sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: WG Review: Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensions > (eppext) > > >One the drafts is about the marks in the ICANN Trademark > >Clearinghouse. I don't see how that draft fits within the Standards > Track. > > I believe that the draft is intended to describe an EPP extension a > registry uses to query the TMCH. Since EPP is on the standards track, > that seems reasonable to me. > > The draft needs a some work to make that clearer, though. True, and the proposed charter makes no statement about the intended status of the considered drafts. If approved that's something for the WG to consider. Scott