On 2013-11-25, at 10:42, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Nov 25, 2013, at 10:38 AM, Joe Abley <jabley@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Isn't this at least part of the motivation behind DANE? >> >> (I realise DANE requires moving parts in the client and signatures in the published zone, but it seems odd that it hasn't been mentioned.) > > Is the DNSSEC root key secure against National Security Letters? I don't know. Sounds like a good question to ask ICANN. Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail