The website and this effort at this time has as much substance as denoted on the archive of the email list http://community.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/
I subscribed to the list and sent a message and yet waiting for a response, seems that not even the ones who created it are subscribed.
It doesn't matter if this is just starting and is in state of flux, unless we are looking at something that is not the "official" site given that this particular domain has been registered in 2004 when IG was not even in the important topics list, the way it looks and works as it is shows a total lack of competence and it has been several months since the Montevideo i* fest.
It does not look serious, it does not look legit, it does not speak well about whoever has the fat fingers on it. If ICANN is behind this, it is preposterous that after collecting hundreds of millions of dollars they came out with that site.
I'm looking forward for a reply to my message Andrew, on that list :-)
Cheers
Jorge
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:36:19PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:Supposing I grant that, though, the question is not what we can laugh
> Sorry, but an organization that opens with, "/1net is hosting a free
> and open online forum about the future of Internet governance" ought
> to know the basics. DNSSEC and IPv6 probably aren't within that
> very constrained set of skills. Certificate handling might or might
> not be. Clear Whois data most definitely is.
at harder, but what we can do about it. That was my challenge, Dave.
I'm not sure how I could have stated it more clearly.
But perhaps I can: do you want to stand outside adding yet more, ahem,
liquid, or do you want to go inside the tent on the principle that you
can then be one of the people pointing out where the tent-poles ought
to be?
Also,
why? Why should this be an effort of the great and glorious? I'm
> set of supporting statements from very well-known folk who have
tired of the great and glorious and the halls of fame and the
we-were-there-when crowd. Why shouldn't this be an effort of those
today interested in doing what we can do now? There's a mailing list.
Why shouldn't we work there, at least for now, as collaboratively as
possible?
Best,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx