Re: Pervasive surveilance isn't an attack, it is a cancer; mandatory encryption doesn't cure it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am in favor of privacy as one of the core values of a safe and secure Internet. I am not in
> favor of a blanket priority for privacy, or for mandatory non-solutions for it.

Larry: Being in favor of a "core value" is cheap because it doesn't
require anything of you.  Personally I value world peace.  If some
people who generally wouldn't know how to work on anything you think
is urgent want to make privacy more possible in the Internet, what
does it cost you? It can only be a zero-sum game if resources are in
the same pool.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]