Well, I'll answer for myself: Not necessary. If someone wants to write a document, tho, I wouldn't try to stop 'em. Eliot On 11/20/13 8:09 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: >> If someone is willing to write the document and explain why ADSP has >> been moved to Historic, that's good for capturing lessons learned. I >> don't think it's required for the status change, but a bonus. > Do you think that more than this is necessary?: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-adsp-rfc5617-to-historic/ > > I should, in particular, direct that question to John, as he's the one > who brought up the question of documenting why... so I am adding John > to the "To" here. > > Barry > >