Hi Dave,
At 08:09 19-11-2013, Dave Crocker wrote:
Again, please focus on the questions and concerns that created this
thread. There have been many conversation, announcements,
documents, meetings, etc. about Internet governance. Most have been
motivated by well-meaning people seeking good outcomes.
The concern discussed on the thread was that, if I can use some words
from one of your messages, the web site raises the "question of
credibility any effort this lofty risks by showing such a basic lack
of vetting skills". As mentioned above, there has been many
announcements, meetings, etc. about Internet governance and most of
them were motivated by well-meaning people. I am not aware of any
positive outcome out of any of the efforts.
So, how is that reference relevant to the current thread, and how is
a person supposed to be able to know that it is relevant?
It would be difficult for a person to determine whether the reference
is relevant or not.
Regards,
-sm