Re: Mandatory encryption as part of HTTP2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/14/13 1:42 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been discussed before, but I haven't been 
> active on this list for a while and I didn't see subject lines
> that indicated recent discussions on this.

There was a lively HTTP WG session in Vancouver on this topic, and I
suggest that we use the ietf-http-wg list for further discussion. IMHO
it is not yet an IETF-wide topic.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=PD9e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]