Re: The RFC xx99 Series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The RFC xx99 Series
From: Joe Abley <jabley@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:45:34 -0700
Cc: "rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAF4+nEEzbKHKGbATwz5xJAJkyoE26b9SpeXSSbDb_FWfOaVSpg@mail.gmail.com>

On 2013-10-08, at 11:38, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Or how about reserving "RFC 3399" for use as an example RFC number...

Do we need a document to document that document for use in documents as documentation?


Joe

References:
- RE: The RFC xx99 Series
  - From: Eric Gray
- Re: The RFC xx99 Series
  - From: Donald Eastlake

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
Next by Date: Re: [Sdn] FW: Last Call: <draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-04.txt> (Software-Defined Networking: A Perspective From Within A Service Provider) to Informational RFC
Previous by thread: Re: The RFC xx99 Series
Next by thread: Re: The RFC xx99 Series
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]