On 10/14/2013 02:39 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > >> Is there a way to decouple this discussion from draft-ietf-6man- >> oversized-header-chain? I would be glad to discuss it in the context of >> a separate draft. > > I don't know if there is a way to decouple it. I believe I have shown > a way to not mess up tunnels while at the same time not messing up your > draft. That should be a win-win. In what way would imposing a 1K limit > on the IPv6 header chain not satisfy the general case? 6man had consensus multiple times on *not* to impose this sort of limits in this document (that's why the original limit of 1280 bytes was removed from earlier versions of this I-D in the first place). Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492