I am struggling to see why name an AD on the front page. There is already a way in the Data Tracker to find out which AD "responsible" at the time of IESG approval. I do not want or see value in being patted on the head for the publication of an RFC. What is the purpose? What would be the implication? Adrian > > On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:10 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@xxxxx> wrote: > >> Would this be an implementation of what you say (example built on > >> one of our recent RFCs) > >> > >> Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Chen > >> Request for Comments: 6829 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd > >> Updates: 4379 P. Pan > >> Category: Standards Track Infinera > >> ISSN: 2070-1721 C. Pignataro > >> Responsible AD: A. Farrel, Juniper R. Asati > >> WG Chair/Shepherd: L. Andersson, Huawei Cisco